Close Menu
blix.gg
    Newest
    The Dota 2 Heroes That Can Fit Into Almost Any Role in Patch 7.38c
    May 12, 2025
    CS2 Anubis Smokes Guide: Win Rounds with Perfect Utility
    May 11, 2025
    VALORANT and League of Legends Partner with Coinbase
    May 11, 2025
    X (Twitter)
    blix.gg
    • CS2
      • CS2 Predictions
      • CS2 Guides
      • Review of Best CS2 Gambling Sites 2025
        • Review of Best CS2 Crash Sites 2025
      • Best CS2 Betting Sites for 2025
    • Deadlock
      • Deadlock Guide
      • Deadlock News
    • Valorant
      • Valorant Skins
      • Valorant Guides
      • Valorant Leaks
    • Dota 2
      • Dota 2 Updates
      • Dota 2 Tournaments
      • Dota 2 Guides
    • LoL
      • League of Legends Guides
      • League of Legends Skins
    • Games
      • Mobile Games
      • Marvel Rivals
      • Apex Legends
      • COD Mobile
    • Industry
    blix.gg
    Home»News»CS2»Two SKADEs, one qualifier — or how SKADE and SKADE X competed in the same European RMR qualifier.
    CS2

    Two SKADEs, one qualifier — or how SKADE and SKADE X competed in the same European RMR qualifier.

    By R. NachewSeptember 6, 20225 Mins Read
    Share
    Twitter
    Banner

    Two separate SKADE teams participated in the third and fourth open qualifiers for the European RMR of the upcoming Rio de Janeiro Major. If each had won two more matches, the two would’ve even met in Round 16 of the third qualifier.

    One is the Bulgarian SKADE. A lineup that the organization has housed and become known for over the last few years. The other, the Norwegian lineup, announced last month under the name ‘SKADE X’. They competed in the qualifier under the name ‘œEn av de lette’ and the tag ‘œ1ADL’.

    Contents

    • 1 Why does it matter?
    • 2 What do the rules say?
    • 3 Details about the SKADEs
    • 4 So, how connected are they?
    • 5 The remaining concerns

    Why does it matter?

    Two teams operating under the same organization, or even under two intertwined organizations, would be in clear violation of the rules. This is why the story ruffled some feathers among competitors and raised observers’ eyebrows. Most of the teams in these qualifiers may be inconsequential to top-tier CS:GO, but the event plays a role in who goes to the Major. Maintaining the competitive integrity of the regional open qualifiers is key to doing the same for the entire Major cycle.

    What do the rules say?

    One of the regulations from the Supplemental Rulebook (regarding team names, logos, and title sponsors) leaves room for interpretation. Some could construe it as a green light for a second team under the same umbrella to participate in the event, as long as the team changes its name and banner. However, the ‘Conflicts of Interest’ and the ‘Multiple teams’ (2.11.3.1 from General Rules) clauses are explicit that any sort of business ‘œentanglement’ between two teams breaks the rules.

    Details about the SKADEs

    When SKADE X was announced last month, it was SKADE’s CEO, Morten Skaland, who commented on the lineup. Skaland described SKADE X as a ‘œcollaboration’ of ‘œvarious parties’. The parties being, as listed: SKADE itself; Jotunheimen Esports, a PC bar with one Alexander Hole as its CEO; and ULTI Skins, which is ostensibly connected to ULTI Agency, but doesn’t share ownership figures per the Norwegian business register.

    Additionally, SKADE X is listed on SKADE’s website and was announced on SKADE’s socialmedia. Of the latter, SKADE X seems to have only an individual Twitter account dedicated to itself. Normally, the two also don the same SKADE logo, with the addition of a stylized X behind it for the Norwegians.

    SKADE, SKADE X logos

    All of this is to say that the two teams give the impression of being very much entangled.

    So, how connected are they?

    For starters, the two rosters appear to be established under separate companies.

    We reached out to Kim-Erik ‘Zarotan’ Aanes (a founder, former managing director, and current head of esports at SKADE) to clarify the situation for us. Initially, he echoed the sentiment from the SKADE X announcement, explaining that SKADE X is operated by a different company owned jointly by the three aforementioned parties. (SKADE, Jotunheimen Esports, and ULTI Skins)

    However, Aanes seemed mostly unaware of what SKADE X is up to and later corrected himself, saying that he was just told the above is not the case. Instead, SKADE X is owned solely by a company named Midgard, of which the aforementioned Alexander Hole of Jotunheimen Esports is a founding board member.

    Hole explained to BLIX that SKADE X is simply a name used for branding purposes, presumably to help with Norwegian sponsorships.

    Before SKADE X, Midgard used to run a team under its name that competed in Telialigaen, a local Norwegian league. Hole and Midgard own the spot in the league, and the newly-assembled SKADE X will compete in place of the old Midgard roster.

    The remaining concerns

    Hole explained that on August 1, he and two parties he broadly referred to as SKADE and ULTI each ‘œput down 10K euros’ to fund contracts and boot camps for the SKADE X team. Additionally, strictly in terms of favors: ULTI would use its knowledge of players to help assemble the team and SKADE would use its resources to create content, promoting SKADE X.

    Thus, all three parties teamed up to strengthen Norwegian CS:GO.

    Hole avoided elaborating on the exact nature of the ‘œagreement’ between the three parties, except reiterating that they consider it an ‘œinvestment from us three parties to create a Norwegian team together, and lift the gaming environment’.

    Morten Skaland, SKADE’™s CEO, hasn’™t responded to our inquiries for a comment on the story either.

    The Supplemental Rulebook prohibits ‘œbusiness entanglement’. It specifically names loans as such, and an investment would likely qualify as one too. But we don’t know the €10,000 that Hole said SKADE provided for Midgard is either. It could just as well have been a donation ‘” even though Hole didn’t identify it as such when asked pointedly ‘” which may be an exception and certainly isn’t named by the rules.

    Furthermore, Hole’s claim that the two companies are separate entities checks out, as there seems to be no overlapping ownership or shareholders according to the Norwegian business register.

    Last but not least, while ESL did not respond to our request for comment, the tournament organizer was aware of the situation. Judging by both teams having been allowed to compete in the fourth qualifier, ESL has likely seen evidence it’s deemed sufficient proof of independence between the two organizations.

    R. Nachew

    You may also like

    By Sebastian "primero" Pereira

    Why Counter-Strike 2 Captivates Gamers Everywhere?

    September 4, 2024
    By Jimmy “Infernal” Young

    lmbt Is Out Of Monte

    September 3, 2024
    By Jimmy “Infernal” Young

    SAW Qualified To ESL Challenger Atlanta

    September 3, 2024
    By Jimmy “Infernal” Young

    Thunderpick WC 2025 Revealed Its Schedule

    September 2, 2024
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Post
    The Dota 2 Heroes That Can Fit Into Almost Any Role in Patch 7.38c
    May 12, 2025
    CS2 Anubis Smokes Guide: Win Rounds with Perfect Utility
    May 11, 2025
    VALORANT and League of Legends Partner with Coinbase
    May 11, 2025
    2025 Road to MSI Qualifier Schedule & Ticket Details Unveiled By LCK 
    May 10, 2025
    blix.gg
    X (Twitter) RSS
    • Editorial Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy policy
    • About us
    • Our Authors
    • Join Our Team
    © 2025 BLIX.GG. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}